How AI Washing is Impacting D&O Insurance: A Growing Risk for Companies and Their Leadership

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a transformative force in almost every industry as companies rapidly adopt and integrate AI-driven solutions. However, with this surge in AI adoption has emerged the concerning trend known as "AI washing." This practice involves companies exaggerating or misrepresenting their AI capabilities in order to attract investors, boost share prices, or gain a competitive edge. AI washing is now a growing risk in the realm of Directors and Officers (D&O) insurance, presenting potential liabilities for company leaders and significant challenges for insurers.

What is AI Washing?

AI washing occurs when a company claims to be leveraging AI in a more advanced or impactful way than it actually does. These misleading disclosures can artificially inflate stock prices, attracting investors under false pretenses. When the truth eventually comes to light—whether through poor financial performance, regulatory scrutiny, or technological shortcomings—companies may face significant financial losses, shareholder lawsuits, and reputational damage.

A common example is a company asserting that its products are AI-powered when, in reality, they rely on basic automation or traditional algorithms. Investors, drawn by the allure of cutting-edge technology, may drive up the company’s valuation, only to see a downturn when actual capabilities fail to meet expectations.

Why AI Washing is a Concern for D&O Insurance

From a D&O insurance perspective, AI washing introduces an emerging risk that underwriters and insurers must now account for. D&O policies protect directors and officers from personal financial loss in the event of lawsuits related to their management decisions. AI washing falls into a category of event-driven litigation, where external events—such as regulatory action or market downturns—trigger shareholder lawsuits.

Key risks include:

• Regulatory Scrutiny
  The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has recently introduced rules requiring more detailed disclosures about companies' use of AI. Misrepresenting AI capabilities could lead to investigations, fines, and legal action.
• Shareholder Litigation
  Investors who suffer financial losses due to misleading AI-related statements may sue directors and officers for misrepresentation or failure to exercise due diligence.
• Cybersecurity and Privacy Issues
  Companies improperly handling AI may inadvertently expose customer data to security risks, further exacerbating potential liabilities.
• Reputational Damage
  Public exposure of AI washing can erode trust in a company's leadership, causing lasting harm beyond immediate financial losses.

The Impact of SEC Regulations on D&O Liability

With the SEC tightening regulations on AI disclosures, companies must now be more transparent about how they deploy AI within their operations. This means that:

• Companies must clearly document their AI strategies and ensure disclosures are accurate and not misleading.
• Leadership teams need to be actively involved in AI governance to mitigate risks and demonstrate responsible management.
• Underwriters must assess the depth and legitimacy of a company’s AI usage before providing D&O coverage.

Failing to comply with these regulations increases the likelihood of SEC enforcement actions and legal repercussions for company executives. In January, the SEC announced it had settled charges against a restaurant-technology company previously on the Nasdaq, for making materially false and misleading statements about critical aspects of its core AI product. You can read more about this case here. 

Risk Mitigation: Steps Companies Can Take

To avoid potential liability related to AI washing and ensure adequate D&O coverage, companies should adopt proactive risk mitigation strategies:

1. Develop an Internal AI Policy: Companies should establish clear internal policies on AI usage, ensuring that all employees understand the scope and limitations of AI technologies within the organization.
2. Implement Governance Frameworks: AI usage should be regularly reviewed by governance committees, similar to cybersecurity and compliance teams, with board oversight.
3. Transparent Disclosures: Companies must ensure that all AI-related disclosures—both internal and external—are factual, verifiable, and compliant with SEC regulations.
4. Train Leadership on AI Risks: Directors and officers should be educated on the risks associated with AI misrepresentation and how to navigate regulatory compliance.
5. Engage Legal and Insurance Experts: Consulting legal advisors and D&O insurance specialists can help organizations navigate the complexities of AI disclosures and risk management.

‍

The Future of D&O Insurance Amid AI Washing

As AI continues to evolve, D&O insurers are adjusting their underwriting strategies to account for AI-related risks. Some trends emerging in the insurance landscape include:

• Increased scrutiny of AI-related disclosures during underwriting.
• The potential introduction of AI-specific exclusions in D&O policies.
• A rise in premium costs for companies with ambiguous or misleading AI claims.

Insurers like Flow also leverage AI to assess risks, identify inconsistencies in company disclosures, and refine their underwriting models.

Conclusion

AI washing presents a new and significant challenge for companies, their leadership, and the insurance industry. With regulatory bodies increasing scrutiny and shareholders becoming more vigilant, the risks associated with misrepresenting AI capabilities are too great to ignore. 

A Flow broker can work with you to assess your governance frameworks, ensure transparency in disclosures, and help you seek additional expert guidance, all of which can mitigate exposure risk and safeguard leadership from potential legal and financial consequences.

‍